Lawmakers taking up the question of how to redraw Oregon’s legislative and congressional districts this year have decided not to take the show on the road.

As COVID-19 continues its alarming spread in the state, members of the Senate and House committees tasked with coming up with new political maps will instead hold required public hearings on potential maps in a virtual hearing format that has grown familiar.

“While the committees had hoped to visit communities across Oregon in person, the recent surge in COVID-19 cases has made this increasingly risky to public health,” Senate President Peter Courtney, D-Salem, and House Speaker Tina Kotek, D-Portland, said in a statement Monday. “More Oregonians are now in our hospitals, intensive care units, or on ventilators than ever before in this pandemic.”

The announcement is not entirely surprising. Chairs of the Senate and House redistricting committees in recent days had voiced uncertainty about whether they would be able to hold in-person public hearings as they have in past redistricting years.

Under state law, legislators are required to hold “at least 10 public hearings at locations throughout the state” before proposing new maps. They’re also encouraged to hold five hearings once maps have been proposed. The law explicitly encourages use of video technology to allow people in far-flung areas to testify.

This year, lawmakers are facing an uncharacteristically rushed time table. Delays at the U.S. Census Bureau meant that states only received detailed population data required for redrawing maps this month, roughly six months late.

As a result Oregon lawmakers have already had to breach constitutional requirements for getting maps completed by July 1. With the blessing of the Oregon Supreme Court, the Legislature now has until Sept. 27 to pass a new plan.

Even so, the Legislature appears set to hold more than the required number of public hearings.

The two legislative redistricting committees held 10 virtual meetings to take testimony from the public in March and April — two hearings apiece for the state’s five congressional districts. While citizens in those hearings did not have access to final census data, they were able to advocate for cultural communities or geographic areas they believe should be united into certain political districts.

Lawmakers now plan to unveil a set of draft maps on Sept. 3, before a series of 12 more virtual public hearings from Sept. 8-13. Of key interest in those maps, and the discussion that follows, will be how lawmakers propose drawing a new, sixth congressional district the state was granted this year.

Citizens have a way to offer input beyond testifying remotely. They can use the Legislature’s district mapping tool to create their own proposed maps for state House and Senate districts, as long as they meet legal requirements for how those districts are arranged.

The once-a-decade redistricting process comes with high political stakes. The outcome of new legislative and congressional maps can dictate which party holds sway in Oregon, and help determine control of Congress.

The post Hearings on new Oregon political maps will be virtual, as COVID spreads appeared first on People Not Politicians.

MEDIA CONTACT
Norman Turrill (503) 807-4863

SALEM, Ore. — “The promise of fair representation should not be a political negotiating tactic between partisan legislators behind closed doors,” said Norman Turrill, Chair of People Not Politicians. “This maneuvering between House Leadership exactly underscores why we need reform and fair redistricting so Oregon voters choose politicians, instead of politicians choosing voters.”

Oregonians support creating an independent citizens redistricting commission. In late 2019, People Not Politicians enlisted Lake Research Partners to run a statewide poll. Results showed an average 76% of Democrats, 67% of Independents, and 60% of Republicans favor an independent citizens’ commission.

“Giving equal representation to Democrats and Republicans on the Redistricting Committee is a positive step forward. The real opportunity for reform will come when the legislature opens up HJR 7 to accept public comments on who draws lines going forward.”
––Dave Dillon, Oregon Farm Bureau Executive Vice President

“Allowing politicians to draw their own maps is like putting a fox in charge of the henhouse—an inherent conflict of interest. The possibility for bipartisan gerrymandering is knocking at the door. Meanwhile, third parties and historically underrepresented communities are left out of the process.”
–Kate Titus, Executive Director, Common Cause Oregon

“The legislature should do what an overwhelming majority of Oregonians have asked for—create an Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission to draw these maps. It’s imperative to the health of our democracy that redistricting be done in the most fair and transparent manner possible. We need to take politics out of the equation.”
–Norman Turrill, Chair, People Not Politicians

The People Not Politicians coalition includes a full spectrum of Oregon’s voices for an Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission: Common Cause Oregon, the League of Women Voters, the Independent Party of Oregon, the NAACP, the Taxpayers Association of Oregon, the Oregon Farm Bureau and others.

###

The post Legislative negotiations underscore need for independent citizens redistricting commission appeared first on People Not Politicians.